Search found 56 matches

by j0nes2k
Wed May 23, 2012 7:28 am
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Crash in real.exe "troubles, could not find trapping x locations"
Replies: 28
Views: 22179

Re: Crash in real.exe

Hello,

after some reading this was exactly what I changed right now... I was using gfs, and now switched to gfsptile and everything seems to be working again. How can this happen?

Thanks!

Jonas
by j0nes2k
Wed May 23, 2012 7:02 am
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Crash in real.exe "troubles, could not find trapping x locations"
Replies: 28
Views: 22179

Crash in real.exe "troubles, could not find trapping x locations"

Hello, I am running WRFEMS for two different models, one over Europe and one over Egypt. However since some runs the Europe model fails in the real.exe part: d01 2012-05-23_03:00:00 Timing for input 1 s. d01 2012-05-23_03:00:00 flag_soil_layers read from met_em file is 1 d01 2012-05-23_03:00:00 Old ...
by j0nes2k
Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:02 pm
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Run simulation in two parts / restarts
Replies: 3
Views: 4180

Re: Run simulation in two parts / restarts

Hello, ah, didn't know about this option (never used it before) - seems like this is just what I needed! However it is not that well documented as the rest of the EMS system, so I have another question regarding the autopost option: My EMS output is normally a monolithic GrADS file. How does this wo...
by j0nes2k
Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:17 pm
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Run simulation in two parts / restarts
Replies: 3
Views: 4180

Run simulation in two parts / restarts

Hello, I am running real-time forecasts based on the GFS model. My forecasts are initialized with the 00-hour forecast and run up to +78 hours. As the computation takes quite some time and I want to see the first results earlier and so that I don't have to wait until the complete simulation has ende...
by j0nes2k
Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:10 pm
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Which Linux distro for WRF EMS - Debian or?
Replies: 5
Views: 5148

Re: Which Linux distro for WRF EMS - Debian or?

Hello,

I am running WRF EMS on Debian without any problems, both on 32bit and 64bit architecture.

Best regards,
Jonas
by j0nes2k
Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:12 pm
Forum: Hardware for running WRF / EMS
Topic: Speed improvement through SSD hard drives
Replies: 3
Views: 3859

Re: Speed improvement through SSD hard drives

Hello,

thank you for your answer! I think I can save the money and buy a more powerful CPU then :)

Best regards,
Jonas
by j0nes2k
Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:26 pm
Forum: Hardware for running WRF / EMS
Topic: Speed improvement through SSD hard drives
Replies: 3
Views: 3859

Speed improvement through SSD hard drives

Hello, I am thinking about getting a new server for my WRF model computations, and I am wondering about the hardware specs I should use for that. Obviously the most important thing is CPU power, but I am wondering what to do about harddrives in general. I know that SSD drives can give a significant ...
by j0nes2k
Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:44 pm
Forum: General NWP, Postprocessing, Meteorology
Topic: WRF EMS Clouds too low in % (ARW core)
Replies: 19
Views: 19309

Re: WRF EMS Cloud's to low in %

Hello,

another thing that came to my mind: which fields do you extract via wrfpost? I currently only extract about 10 variables, mostly surface related. Do I have to include other output variables to get better cloud cover data?

Best regards,
Jonas Kaufmann
by j0nes2k
Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:24 pm
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Experiences with Gravity Wave Drag turned on?
Replies: 5
Views: 5611

Re: Experiences with Gravity Wave Drag turned on?

Hello meteoadriatic, interesting points, thank you! I have found a forum about Crete and began to look for first-hand knowledge from locals like sailors or fishermen in that area. The first responses are already coming in, and it seems that my 12km model could be right. I got responses about particu...
by j0nes2k
Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:16 pm
Forum: General NWP, Postprocessing, Meteorology
Topic: WRF EMS Clouds too low in % (ARW core)
Replies: 19
Views: 19309

Re: WRF EMS Cloud's to low in %

Hello delinend, By edit physichs, you can get a look-alike arwPOST. Can you give me a hint of what you mean with this? Should I edit physics settings in my model or is it simply a output (GrADS) thing? As a sidenote (and as my main interest is northern Germany which is not that far from Scandinavia)...